|
|
|
Famous Writer
 
  
Group: Customers
Last Login: 12/1/2008 11:02:25 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 476,
Visits: 1,264
|
|
Presently the Individual Pictures Tab is misleading and/or ambiguous simply because this tab deals with and only shows the pictures associated with the Individual, i.e. of the Individual Object Type. I believe this tab should, within the picture list, also shows all the other pictures associated with Object Type: Edu, Occu and Sources. My suggestion is to: 1) list all pictures of all Object Types in the Picture List (PL). 2) make sure the Object Type field is permanently shown in the PL, right after the Picture Name for example. 3) Add up a note somewhere within the tab saying something like: To create a Non-Individual Object Type picture, proceed through the appropriate Edu, Occu or Sources tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Legendary Master
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:36:29 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523,
Visits: 14,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 12/1/2008 11:02:25 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 476,
Visits: 1,264
|
|
| Yes, this is similar to the post you refer to. But this topic has been posted a few days before the one you refer to. The Picture and the Source tabs should regroup and show all Pict and Sources associated with an Individual. Additionally, I noticed that, on the Source Prop panel, it is possible to enter info in the field called "Source File or URL". In the case of a URL, perhaps this URL should also be shown in the Individual Contact tab list. It may not be a "direct" Contact as such, but rather a "ref." contact. Up to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Legendary Master
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:36:29 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523,
Visits: 14,877
|
|
jcguasp (8/5/2006)
Additionally, I noticed that, on the Source Prop panel, it is possible to enter info in the field called "Source File or URL". In the case of a URL, perhaps this URL should also be shown in the Individual Contact tab list. It may not be a "direct" Contact as such, but rather a "ref." contact. Up to you.I will think of a solution.
|
|
|
|