|
|
|
Famous Writer
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 12/10/2007 9:55:16 PM
Posts: 236,
Visits: 426
|
|
When i put a marriage as annulled i get this in the report
(minor but still a bug)
Rodney Keith and unkown were married. Their marriage was annulledThey were divorced. They have a son and a daughter, named Chris and Amy. Male Chris Female Amy
also in the tree with 2b17
when i put the couple as divorced i no longer get the // through the marriage line
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 6:22:16 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 311,
Visits: 1,909
|
|
crash893 (8/9/2006)
also in the tree with 2b17
when i put the couple as divorced i no longer get the // through the marriage line
I am using 2b17i and the divorce line (and the other Relation lines) are displaying correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Legendary Master
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 8:09:17 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.4.0.3
Posts: 3,523,
Visits: 14,878
|
|
You need to explicitly pick the Divorce relationship to display the // on the family tree. The Unions dialog documents the events but has no effect on the display.
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 12/10/2007 9:55:16 PM
Posts: 236,
Visits: 426
|
|
why not
if they are divorced they are divorced
why do i need to mark it in multiable spots
what about the space issue?
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 12/1/2008 11:02:25 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 476,
Visits: 1,264
|
|
The following phrase “PhDivorce”, to my opinion, is actually not finished: <!-- 0=marriage annulment, 1=divorce date, 2=divorce place, 3=divorce requested by -->
<PhDivorce T="{  }[{?0}Their marriage was annulled][{?!0}They were divorced{1}{2h}][{?3}They were divorced]." /> |
because the 4 fields: “Requested by”, “Husband’s Attorney”, “Wife’s Attorney” and “Officiator / Agency” are presently not included/taken into account in the phrase. Or is it done on purpose? Same, of course, applies to the associated code line 193 of Lang.vbs. I suppose this is another wee job for Ron. I also agree that, as soon as something (the “Marriage Annulled” tick box or any/some of the other fields) has been input within the “Divorce” section, the connecting line and the “Relation” field on the Gene tab, should automatically update to a divorce (or also possibly Nullity) type union. In fact, I even suggest that this field “Relation”, if possible within the system, be totally interactive, based on the various input fields of the divorce section but also in case of one Ind dies, the Relation field should also auto-update from, say, a Legal Cohab into a Legal Cohab and Deceased.
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Master
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 1:41:33 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 1,153,
Visits: 5,406
|
|
Yes I had picked up on the original post from crash893 modified the phrase to <!-- 0=marriage annulment, 1=divorce date, 2=divorce place, 3=divorce requested by -->
<PhDivorce T="{  }[{?0}Their marriage was annulled][{?!0}[{?1|2|3}They were divorced]]{1}{2h}[ at the request of {3}]." />
|
ready for Beta 18 but I seem to have overlooked responding to the post.  I'll take another look and include the attorneys and officiators/agencies. The relation field was perhaps originally intended for use when there was no marriage/divorce information present. I will look at the report a see if I can change it so that the family relationship line pattern reflects the state of the union if the relation field is blank. Perhaps Dan could add a check in Genopro and flag a warning when the relation value contradicts the 'union' status and also use the union status for the line when left blank. The 'union' object also needs to be extended to record relationship states other than marriage & divorce/annulment. e.g. dating, engagement, cohabitation etc. Maybe it could be extended to cover all 'family' events.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 12/1/2008 11:02:25 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 476,
Visits: 1,264
|
|
| Thanks Ron. Don't forget, in Lang.vbs, to remove <> "" at the very end of the parameters list, otherwise it says: 
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 12/1/2008 11:02:25 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 476,
Visits: 1,264
|
|
Another small remark: when the option “Don’t Know” is selected, the narrative says:
I simply suggest to remove this option from the drop down list.
|
|
|
|
| | |