|
|
|
Famous Writer
 
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 10:57:05 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.5
Posts: 314,
Visits: 4,197
|
|
| 1) Possibly identical entity 2) Adjacent graves 3) In same grave For (2) and (3) some special graphical/visual symbols shall also be welcome: - Horizontally duplicated symbols for (2) [e.g.: 00] - Vertically duplicated symbols for (3) [e.g.: 8 ] Thanks,;)
additional email: finkea@mail.biu.ac.il ARIGATO-GOZAIMASU(jp) DAKUJEM(sk) DANKE(d) EVHARISTIES(gr) GRAZIE(it) MERCI(f) MULTUMESC(ro) SPASIVA(ru) THANKS(gb) THODAH(il)
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Customers
Last Login: 4/16/2008 2:44:34 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.4
Posts: 29,
Visits: 142
|
|
It's been a while since I tried to contribute here... Recently I came across something that I think the current list lacks, too.
"Founder of"
On a side note, is there a way to hide social relationships? Using them for, say, godparents, can clog up a genomap pretty quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Group: Customers
Last Login: 8/7/2008 6:52:40 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.5
Posts: 11,
Visits: 41
|
|
Hello, I'm new on here and the Beta, but been using GemoPro for a few years. I find these social relationships very irritating, too numerous and would also like to be able to hide or remove or re-configure them. Instead, it would be better to keep the system defined ones like “Spouse”, “Child”, “Adopted”, “Pet” etc, using what’s there now, and then be able to define some extra custom ones such as “Godparent”, “Bastard”, “Probable Child”, "Common Law Wife" etc. I would certainly like to add some squiggly lines for relations I’m not too sure about!
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
 
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 12:27:46 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 437,
Visits: 2,550
|
|
SurreyJohn (11/6/2006)
Hello, I'm new on here and the Beta, but been using GemoPro for a few years. I find these social relationships very irritating, too numerous and would also like to be able to hide or remove or re-configure them. Instead, it would be better to keep the system defined ones like “Spouse”, “Child”, “Adopted”, “Pet” etc, using what’s there now, and then be able to define some extra custom ones such as “Godparent”, “Bastard”, “Probable Child”, "Common Law Wife" etc. I would certainly like to add some squiggly lines for relations I’m not too sure about! Genealogical data consists only of genealogical relationships, any other relationship is most probably social one (as godparents). One is someone's child or it's not - you can add additional info to a relationshp which might describe it better, but cannot someone describe as "bastard". It is a person to whom one of the parents is <unknown> or it's not legitimate child of someone... "Probable child" might be described with different colouring of line... "Common Law Wife" is term I just haven't heard of... but I'm almost sure it fits in one of the categories of relationships allready there. ...and BTW, you can draw a line as squiggly as you wish, if you draw it point-by-point but if you thought of direct family lines that look as "abuse", well - we'll just have to ask Dan for them...
- "εν οιδα οτι ουδεν οιδα" (Σωκρατησ) - "The only thing that I know is that I don't know anything" (Socrates)
|
|
|
|