|
|
|
Famous Writer
 
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 3:46:43 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 385,
Visits: 2,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Master
 
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 7:03:56 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 704,
Visits: 5,768
|
|
| Had myself also a look into this and suggest to treat a pet not as a child, linked to the marriage line, but as an independent individual, linked via a social relationship. At this point I like to suggest that a link can be established from the marriage line also, since usually a pet is not linked to a member of the family but lives with the family. Even if you link him as a foster child(pet), still the pet is recorded of having sisters and/or brothers, which is strange.
|
|
|
|
|
Legendary Master
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 6:12:04 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 3,488,
Visits: 14,607
|
|
I agree Pets should be a "social relationship". Pets have been introduced in GenoPro version 1.00 back in 1998, and this code has never been revised. Also, there are male and female pets. At the moment, GenoPro consider pet a Gender which is wrong. I will have to fix this some day.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Customers
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:33:04 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 42,
Visits: 232
|
|
| Thank you for this thread .. I was able to clean up the situation with about a dozen pets and their owners. One thing I noticed was that the text isn't ideal when the owner has multiple pets. Here's what it generated for one person with 4 pets: "Stevie lives with Bird 1. He lives with Bird 2. He lives with Weasel 1. He lives with Weasel 2." Could this be changed to "Stevie lives with Bird 1, Bird 2, Weasel 1, and Weasel 2."? or "Stevie owns ..." Also, when I set up the social relationships, I showed them as "the pet living with the owner", but the report spits it out as "the owner living with the pet". Could this please be corrected? |
|
|
|
|
Forum Guru
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 8/11/2008 12:01:08 PM
GenoPro Version: FTPClient1
Posts: 146,
Visits: 394
|
|
| How might you get this to report, is there a newer version of GenoPro out there?
|
|
|
|