|
|
|
|
Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Wednesday, June 2, 2021
Posts: 220,
Visits: 14,736
|
Hello,
is it possible to export to gedcom values from godfather and godmother fiels (not with NOTE tag)? I use Export to Gedcom Version 2014.01.22 |
|
|
|
|
Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 27 minutes ago
Posts: 473,
Visits: 3,222
|
I can be mistaken but there does not seem to be a provision in GEDCOM (5.5) for this.
The only thing I could find was the association/relation indication for a given individual that he is the godfather of another individual, like in:
0 @I1@ INDI
1 NAME Fred/Jones/
1 ASSO @I2@
2 RELA Godfather
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 1 hour ago
Posts: 3,383,
Visits: 25,954
|
I have looking into this on other forums as well. It appears that the relation is round the other way i.e. from the Gedcom Standard:Other associations or relationships are represented by the ASSOciation tag. The person's relationor association is the person being pointed to. The association or relationship is stated by the value on the subordinate RELA line. For example: |
and also RELATION_IS_DESCRIPTOR:= {Size=1:25}A word or phrase that states object 1's relation is object 2. For example you would read the following as "Joe Jacob's great grandson is the submitter pointed to by the @XREF:SUBM@": 0 INDI 1 NAME Joe /Jacob/ 1 ASSO @<XREF:SUBM>@ 2 RELA great grandson |
I interpret the 1st example as meaning that the Individual with ID I2 is the Godfather of Fred Jones, i.e. Fred is the grandson.
My Export to Gedcom skin produces ASSO & RELA tags from GenoPro Social & Emotional Relationships but I appear to have misinterpreted the direction of such relationships when creating the tags too. Currently running the Export skin on  gives: 0 @ind00001@ INDI1 NAME godson // 2 GIVN godson 1 SEX M 1 ASSO @ind00002@ 2 RELA godchild 0 @ind00002@ INDI 1 NAME godfather // 2 GIVN godfather 1 SEX M 1 ASSO @ind00001@ 2 RELA godparent |
when it should be:1 NAME godson //2 GIVN godson 1 SEX M 1 ASSO @ind00002@ 2 RELA godparent 0 @ind00002@ INDI 1 NAME godfather // 2 GIVN godfather 1 SEX M 1 ASSO @ind00001@ 2 RELA godchild |
I will fix that.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
Edited: Thursday, February 6, 2014 by
genome
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 27 minutes ago
Posts: 473,
Visits: 3,222
|
The more I read this, the more I'm getting confused.
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 1 hour ago
Posts: 3,383,
Visits: 25,954
|
I like to look at this way:
The RELA qualifies the ASSO tag, so the relationship describes the ASSO individual, not the INDI individual. i.e we have INDI->ASSO->RELA not INDI->RELA->ASSO. (or does that just confuse thing even more :ermm Anyway in version 2014.02.07 of the skin I have switched it around to what I think matches the spec. . I have also enhanced to way in which RELA value is derived by taking gender into account, so for example now have godson/goddaughter instead of godchild. To the OP, powery, I think social relationships are a better way to show godparents, as it is then two way, i.e. you can see the godchildren of the godparents as well. The baptism fields are just text entries and do not link to individuals on the GenoMap (and are only exported as NOTE entries :rolleyes If you don't want unrelated godparents cluttering your GenoMap, I suggest you move them to another unused GenoMap. The social relationship remains and gets reported but is not visible on either GenoMap.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|