|
|
|
Forum Member
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 8/17/2005 10:23:14 PM
Posts: 48,
Visits: 0
|
|
Is it necessary to display the picture name underneath of the pictures, since the name appears when you move the mouse cursor over the picture and besides you have a description of the picture?
Better make it optional then. I prefer having a short picture text right underneath the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Master
 
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 8:14:43 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 1,151,
Visits: 5,403
|
|
Ok have made some changes so here goes:
rjn
i) #3 is now fixed.
ii) can't seem to reproduce #5. I'm using Firefox version 1.0.5 under Windows XP Home. You could try changing the values in script.js line 583 to see if it helps.
iii) I am aware of the problem with the indentation of the 1st line of notes but can't find a fix at present.
maru-san
i)The individual's page lists all his/her relationships, and show the children under each relationship, so 'he/she had x children' would be incorrect if he/she had further children in another relationship. You could instead say 'he/she had x children with this partner' but I think 'They had x children' is simplier and correct in this context.
ii)text/picture alignment. They are aligned with the standards-compliant Firefox browser, so perhaps this is another quirk of Microsoft's IE. The pictures are in a box padded to the maximum picture dimensions to prevent/minimise page movement when running a slide show. You could remove these extra margins if required.
iii)Picture sizes can now be set as Report Parameters in Config.xml. There are also parameter options to show/hide spouse's pictures and picture names.
randee15
i)Fixed the marriage annulment duplication. I have moved the text to the Dictionary for ease of amendment. Note that it is feasible to have say an annulled religious marriage followed by a civil marriage for the same couple, and so the text 'This marriage was annulled', which will follow the marriage details, is more universal than 'Their marriage was annulled'. But you can change the text anyway you choose.
ii)I think the 'Child_' error is because you have a only child with no gender set. I've added a Dictionary entry to allow for this, so instead of a son or daughter the report will state 'child of unknown gender'. A warning is flagged at present if there is more than one child in the family and one or more have no gender, as they cannot be counted as sons or daughters.
Update: I've removed links from this post, see later posts for latest revision of template and preview. See Topic7075-60-1.aspx&start=47
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 11/15/2008 12:46:46 PM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.5
Posts: 65,
Visits: 132
|
|
Thanks Ron,
1. Guilotine problem in IE does not happen again
2. Shifting one position right in Mozilla seems to affect some pictures presentation. Some are now too much (one position?) to the right and the right border is not shown...
3. Show/hide comments does not work at all (in both IE and Mozilla). The screen comes out with all comments hidden by default and clicking show all has no effect. Only clicking the individual comment works.
4 Get Warning: ind00058 is a child of unknown gender and has been excluded from list of children
Probably similar to what was already discussed above.
5. LanguageDictionary.Lookup("Sibling_") failed! What does it mean? The report seems to be OK.
Thanks, Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Master
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 8:14:43 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 1,151,
Visits: 5,403
|
|
Hi Mark,
Looks like 3 steps forward and one step back. I'll take a look at 2 & 3 tomorrow.
Item 4 is the same as previously discussed. I'll add some code to show count of children with unknown gender and remove the warning. Item 5 is very similar to 4, I just haven't put the warning in yet. This occurs when counting brothers & sisters and again it comes across a person? with no gender. It tries to do a Dictionary lookup and fails to find it. you could add the following line to the dictionary | <Sibling_ T="sibling of unknown gender"/> |
and then the report will contain something like 'He/She has a sibling of unknown gender.'
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 12:57:35 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 239,
Visits: 3,871
|
|
| Why is it not possiable to exclude marriage details fron the reoprt the same way we can exclude an individual from it?
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 8/17/2005 10:23:14 PM
Posts: 48,
Visits: 0
|
|
Thanks, Ron. I'll keep my eyes open for any more bugs. Yesterday I got a major contribution to my tree from a relative of mine, which is gonna double the data I have, so it's very possible to bump into new situations.
Hehe, I "solved" the MAJOR bug #3 with hyperlinks. See Neat Hyperlink & Report Generator bug.
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Master
Group: Customers
Last Login: Today @ 8:14:43 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.6
Posts: 1,151,
Visits: 5,403
|
|
"Once more into the breach, dear friends"
Yes, yet another revision of Sample #3. Show/Hide notes now working again, children/sibling with no gender handled correctly, fixed the right margin problem and ...
guess what ...
fixed some if not all hyperlinked spouse issues! This is not the original GenoPro hyperlink problem, which I now find quite elusive, but an error I introduced, apologies for that. I would be interested to know if others still get problems with hyperlinks.
and a few other small changes as well.
Update: I've removed links from this post, see later posts for latest revision of template and preview. See Topic7075-60-1.aspx&start=47
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Famous Writer
Group: Customers
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:23:05 AM
GenoPro Version: 2.0.1.4
Posts: 438,
Visits: 3,414
|
|
Ron, Your templates are superb, especially the last one.
Only one thing that I noticed was that there were the same family details on each of the spouses pages but no family page.
It appears that Dan is going to include the family pages in the next update which would make it possible to lighten the parsonal pages to include only links to the family pages, spouses and children (without photos and details of them) as it was in the old version and this might save some memory space on hard drives and especially web sites.
Though I can't help with the programming, I greatly appreciate the ongoing discussions between those who can, and enjoy trying out the new versions on my test tree.
Your latest template only needs the family pages and it will be perfect (at least for me!)
:D
|
|
|
| | |