GenoPro Home
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 

GenoPro Support Forum




Order in which siblings are referred to needs looking at

Click to view RSS...
Author
Posted Saturday, October 14, 2006 - Post #13779
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Customers
GenoPro version: 3.0.0.5

Last Login: Monday, April 15, 2019
Posts: 18, Visits: 71
This may have been mentioned before but I have noticed that the order of the words "son and daughter" is maintained in reports even when the daughter is ranked 1 in the family and the son is ranked 2.  This produces a sentence such as "They had a son and a daughter, named Anne and John".  The names are set out in the right order but the earlier words do not match them.  In my example, Anne is unlikely to be a son and John is unlikely to be a daughter (although the order of the words "a son and a daughter" suggests that they are) but other names are less easily recognized as being male or female.
Posted Saturday, October 14, 2006 - Post #13782
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Customers
Important Contributors
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Tuesday, November 25, 2025
Posts: 443, Visits: 7,821
wolfman2601 (10/14/2006)
This may have been mentioned before but I have noticed that the order of the words "son and daughter" is maintained in reports even when the daughter is ranked 1 in the family and the son is ranked 2.  This produces a sentence such as "They had a son and a daughter, named Anne and John".  The names are set out in the right order but the earlier words do not match them.  In my example, Anne is unlikely to be a son and John is unlikely to be a daughter (although the order of the words "a son and a daughter" suggests that they are) but other names are less easily recognized as being male or female.

You are right. Interestingly, siblings are reported correctly - all brothers first and then all the sisters.

Posted Saturday, October 21, 2006 - Post #13950
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Customers
GenoPro version: 3.0.0.5

Last Login: Monday, April 15, 2019
Posts: 18, Visits: 71
This problem does not appear to have been fixed in 2.b19c
Posted Monday, October 23, 2006 - Post #14015
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:23 PM
Posts: 3,464, Visits: 26,854
I think the fix is to change Lang.vbs as follows:

Line 219 from
 Set collChildren = f.children.ToGenoCollection
to
 Set collChildren = f.children.ToGenoCollection.SortByGender

Update: this is not quite right as it affects the order in which children are reported below when family details also shown on individual's page. I have a correction for the next Report update.


'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"


Edited: Friday, November 3, 2006 by Ron


Similar Topics

Click to view RSS...
Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse