GenoPro Home
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 

GenoPro Support Forum




Name index birth record

Click to view RSS...
Author
Posted Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - Post #14756
Grand Master

Grand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand Master

Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.0

Last Login: 6 hours ago
Posts: 1,595, Visits: 32,483
In the name index where the date of birth is known, this is added to a name as (b. 1770).

On the older records I am collating, most of them only have baptism records.
Is it possible to add the baptism date, where birth is not known, as (c. 1770)?
Posted Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - Post #14766
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: 2 days ago @ 9:23 PM
Posts: 3,464, Visits: 26,854
I will look into this, but what do you mean by 'c.'? It is possibly ambiguous, meaning either 'Circa' or 'Christening'. Perhaps two characters should be used depending on the 'Religous ceremony setting' i.e. ba. (baptism) ch. christening, br. Brith-Milar, co. (confirmation). These would need to be Dictionary entries to allow translation to other languages.


'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
Posted Tuesday, November 28, 2006 - Post #14777
Grand Master

Grand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand MasterGrand Master

Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.0

Last Login: 6 hours ago
Posts: 1,595, Visits: 32,483
I had suggested c. as circa but had forgotten that there will be other examples to include, so yes two letters will be preferable. Ba is fine by me, but others may prefer an alternative.

Then comes the question of sort order: it is presumably possible to sort these records but should they be in sequence with the birth data, or added afterwards. I would have thought that would be less confusing.


Similar Topics

Click to view RSS...
Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse