GenoPro Home
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 

GenoPro Support Forum




"Most Popular Places" needs revision

Click to view RSS...
Author
Posted Monday, January 1, 2007 - Post #15538
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Customers
GenoPro version: 3.0.0.5

Last Login: Monday, April 15, 2019
Posts: 18, Visits: 71
The family tree I am working on has become very complex and it has proved best to separate the various constituent families into individual GenoMaps.  When generating a report in respect of an individual GenoMap, the report correctly lists under "Most Popular Family Names" only those names used in the relevant GenoMap but under "Most Popular Places" it lists all places used throughout the whole document Family Tree whether used in that individual GenoMap or not.  I suspect that this is a bug in the Report Generator.  Is there a fix?

Edited: Monday, January 1, 2007 by wolfman2601
Posted Monday, January 1, 2007 - Post #15543
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Thursday, April 10, 2025
Posts: 4,886, Visits: 22,776
The algorithm to delete unused object (places, pictures, sources & citations) needs to be completely redone. At the moment GenoPro considers an object as orphan (stray) if it has no references, however there are cases of a circular references where those objects should be deleted but are not deleted. This is often the case when generating a report for a single GenoMap.

For instance, an object such as a place having a picture is not be deleted if the place includes its picture. If both the place and the pictures are not used anywhere, those objects should be deleted, however the current code does not handle this scenario. I don't want to touch this code now because the impacts of creating a bug can be quite serious. A small bug in the code could delete valid pictures, places, sources. I will revise this code on the next "Beta" (aka Gamma).


Edited: Monday, January 1, 2007 by GenoProSupport


Similar Topics

Click to view RSS...
Expand / Collapse
TopicKey_Topic
Is it possible to add custom emotional relationships?
Wednesday, September 2, 2020
Last Post: genome
TopicKey_Topic
Cannot access the toolbar to label and describe emotional relationships
Saturday, March 28, 2020
Last Post: genome
TopicKey_Topic
I need legends for emotional relationships and I think social relationships as well.
Friday, June 17, 2016
Last Post: kryslalee
TopicKey_Topic
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Last Post: genome
TopicKey_Topic
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Last Post: genome

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse
Active: 4 - 1 guest, 2 members, 0 anonymous.
Refresh