GenoPro Home
|
Get Started With My Genealogy Tree
|
Buy
|
Login
|
Privacy
|
Search
|
Site Map
GenoPro Support Forum
Home
Search
Tags
Who's On
Welcome Guest
(
Login
|
Register
)
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Home
»
GenoProX Wish List
»
Suggestions for Problem Spotter
»
Missing union dates in multiple unions
12 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
Missing union dates in multiple unions
Rate Topic
Topic View
Topic Options
Author
Confuse both GenoPro and the Report Writer
genome
Posted Thursday, April 25, 2019
-
Post #39826
Legendary Master
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 38 minutes ago
Posts: 3,412,
Visits: 26,306
Thanks testers, now maybe third time lucky? or 'if at first you don't succeed, try, try again'. Why are things never so simple as they first appear?
the main problem lies in identifying the
families
where one of the (multiple)
union dates
is missing.
So I misread the brief, I was reporting
individuals
with missing dates on one or more of their unions, not the families themselves. I have now changed the
report
heading to be
Families with no union date of individuals having multiple unions but no \'
Mate Order
\' set
A bit of a mouthful but I think that covers it.
I don't know why the
Report Generator
API considers Family Marriage.Date blank when only the
year
is present, as it shows up fine in the Families
Table Layout
View. Anyway just testing for a year seems to do the trick.
Once again I have edited my earlier post and updated the zip
'lego audio video erro ergo disco'
or "
I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn
"
Nand
Posted Friday, April 26, 2019
-
Post #39829
Famous Writer
Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Thursday, February 27, 2025
Posts: 475,
Visits: 3,229
Yes, this looks OK. The reports of the different tools seem to match.
I have included the output of the Missing Union Dates skin report and two (tandem) reports from my tool. I'm listing the individuals for which a manual mate order has been declared in a separate report. This makes it easier for me to
find
out which dates I still have to look up.
There must be more people out there who made the same mistake as I did. When you are drawing the
genealogy
tree
you do not realise that the reported information might be organised different.
Doc 2.zip
(
7 views,
280.21 KB
)
12 posts, Page 2 of 2
««
1
2
Similar Topics
Reading This Topic
Active: 3 - 1 guest, 1 member, 0 anonymous.
Online:
genome
Powered By InstantForum.NET 2010-3-x © 2025
Execution: 0.016.
5 queries.
Compression Enabled.
Search All Forums...
GO
Advanced Search
Rate Topic
Great
Good
Average
Bad
Poor
Rate This Topic
Flat Ascending
Flat Descending
Threaded
Subscribe To Topic
Print This Topic
Goto Topics Forum