|
|
|
|
Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Monday, June 2, 2025
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,796
|
Ron (8/21/2006)
Drifting off the original topic again but another one for the Problem spotter list is multiple pedgree links of the same type for an individual to the same family, particularly hidden ones spanning from one genomap to another to a hyperlink of that individual, as these cannot be seen without moving the hyperlinked individual back to the original genomap. This is a great suggestion. I have added the following to the Problem Spotter: Find hidden objects such as overlapping pedigree links, family lines and individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:38 PM
Posts: 3,429,
Visits: 26,549
|
GenoProSupport (8/18/2006)
GenoPro 3.0 will have a Problem Spotter to display warnings of potential errors such as the birth of a child before its parents, a child with more than two biological parents, divorce date prior marriage date, etc. Drifting off the original topic again but another one for the Problem spotter list is multiple pedgree links of the same type for an individual to the same family, particularly hidden ones spanning from one genomap to another to a hyperlink of that individual, as these cannot be seen without moving the hyperlinked individual back to the original genomap.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
Gamma
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Sunday, January 19, 2025
Posts: 11,
Visits: 143
|
GenoPro 3.0
A bit off-topic, but I wonder, how are you planning to proceede - will 3.0 be the next full version, or will there be 2.1, 2.2 etc?
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Monday, June 2, 2025
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,796
|
Ron (8/14/2006)
Perhaps Dan could add a check in Genopro and flag a warning when the relation value contradicts the 'union' status and also use the union status for the line when left blank.GenoPro 3.0 will have a Problem Spotter to display warnings of potential errors such as the birth of a child before its parents, a child with more than two biological parents, divorce date prior marriage date, etc. I have added this suggestion to our Problem Spotter list.
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Members
GenoPro version: FTPClient1
Last Login: Monday, April 5, 2021
Posts: 72,
Visits: 611
|
Or change it to read "at the request of one of the two" or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Customers
Translator
GenoPro version: 2.0.1.6
Last Login: Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Posts: 390,
Visits: 1,271
|
Another small remark: when the option “Don’t Know” is selected, the narrative says:
I simply suggest to remove this option from the drop down list.
|
|
|
|
|
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Customers
Translator
GenoPro version: 2.0.1.6
Last Login: Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Posts: 390,
Visits: 1,271
|
Thanks Ron.Don't forget, in Lang.vbs, to remove <> "" at the very end of the parameters list, otherwise it says: 
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:38 PM
Posts: 3,429,
Visits: 26,549
|
Yes I had picked up on the original post from crash893 modified the phrase to <!-- 0=marriage annulment, 1=divorce date, 2=divorce place, 3=divorce requested by -->
<PhDivorce T="{  }[{?0}Their marriage was annulled][{?!0}[{?1|2|3}They were divorced]]{1}{2h}[ at the request of {3}]." />
|
ready for Beta 18 but I seem to have overlooked responding to the post.  I'll take another look and include the attorneys and officiators/agencies. The relation field was perhaps originally intended for use when there was no marriage/divorce information present. I will look at the report a see if I can change it so that the family relationship line pattern reflects the state of the union if the relation field is blank. Perhaps Dan could add a check in Genopro and flag a warning when the relation value contradicts the 'union' status and also use the union status for the line when left blank. The 'union' object also needs to be extended to record relationship states other than marriage & divorce/annulment. e.g. dating, engagement, cohabitation etc. Maybe it could be extended to cover all 'family' events.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Customers
Translator
GenoPro version: 2.0.1.6
Last Login: Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Posts: 390,
Visits: 1,271
|
The following phrase “PhDivorce”, to my opinion, is actually not finished:
<!-- 0=marriage annulment, 1=divorce date, 2=divorce place, 3=divorce requested by -->
<PhDivorce T="{  }[{?0}Their marriage was annulled][{?!0}They were divorced{1}{2h}][{?3}They were divorced]." /> |
because the 4 fields: “Requested by”, “Husband’s Attorney”, “Wife’s Attorney” and “Officiator / Agency” are presently not included/taken into account in the phrase. Or is it done on purpose? Same, of course, applies to the associated code line 193 of Lang.vbs. I suppose this is another wee job for Ron. I also agree that, as soon as something (the “Marriage Annulled” tick box or any/some of the other fields) has been input within the “Divorce” section, the connecting line and the “Relation” field on the Gene tab, should automatically update to a divorce (or also possibly Nullity) type union. In fact, I even suggest that this field “Relation”, if possible within the system, be totally interactive, based on the various input fields of the divorce section but also in case of one Ind dies, the Relation field should also auto-update from, say, a Legal Cohab into a Legal Cohab and Deceased.
Edited: Friday, August 18, 2006 by
GenoProSupport
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, December 10, 2007
Posts: 72,
Visits: 426
|
why not
if they are divorced they are divorced
why do i need to mark it in multiable spots
what about the space issue?
Edited: Sunday, August 13, 2006 by
crash893
|