GenoPro Home
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 

GenoPro Support Forum




Author Narrative Report Bug - Pets treated as children
Posted Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - Post #19248
Forum Writer

Forum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum WriterForum Writer

Forum Members
GenoPro version: FTPClient1

Last Login: Monday, April 5, 2021
Posts: 72, Visits: 611
How might you get this to report, is there a newer version of GenoPro out there?
Posted Saturday, September 8, 2007 - Post #19152
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Posts: 264, Visits: 1,760
Thank you for this thread .. I was able to clean up the situation with about a dozen pets and their owners.

One thing I noticed was that the text isn't ideal when the owner has multiple pets.  Here's what it generated for one person with 4 pets:

"Stevie lives with Bird 1.
He lives with Bird 2.
He lives with Weasel 1.
He lives with Weasel 2."
 
Could this be changed to "Stevie lives with Bird 1, Bird 2, Weasel 1, and Weasel 2."? or "Stevie owns ..."
 
Also, when I set up the social relationships, I showed them as "the pet living with the owner", but the report spits it out as "the owner living with the pet".  Could this please be corrected?


Edited: Saturday, September 8, 2007 by Nick K
Posted Wednesday, August 22, 2007 - Post #18938
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Posts: 4,886, Visits: 22,799
I agree Pets should be a "social relationship".  Pets have been introduced in GenoPro version 1.00 back in 1998, and this code has never been revised.  Also, there are male and female pets.  At the moment, GenoPro consider pet a Gender which is wrong.  I will have to fix this some day.
Posted Wednesday, August 22, 2007 - Post #18937
Forum Master

Forum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum Master

Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Sunday, March 21, 2021
Posts: 716, Visits: 12,927
Had myself also a look into this and suggest to treat a pet not as a child, linked to the marriage line, but as an independent individual, linked via a social relationship. At this point I like to suggest that a link can be established from the marriage line also, since usually a pet is not linked to a member of the family but lives with the family. Even if you link him as a foster child(pet), still the pet is recorded of having sisters and/or brothers, which is strange.
Posted Wednesday, August 22, 2007 - Post #18936
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Customers
Important Contributors
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.0

Last Login: Thursday, January 11, 2024
Posts: 386, Visits: 4,475
In the English Narrative Report, pets are treated as children of unknown gender.

Poolzone  a mere cog in a revolution


Similar Topics

Click to view RSS...
Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse