GenoPro Home
GenoPro Home  |  Get Started With My Genealogy Tree  |  Buy  |  Login  |  Privacy  |  Search  |  Site Map
 

GenoPro Support Forum




Narrative & Descendant Report 2.0.1.6 Release Candidates

Click to view RSS...
Author Updated report skins for testing
Posted Thursday, August 7, 2008 - Post #22351
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Monday, June 2, 2025
Posts: 4,886, Visits: 22,796
Ron (8/6/2008)
There appears to be a bug in the GenoPro ReportGenerator Dic.Plurial (key, count) method. According to the SDK documentation, it should return the plural of the word according to the count.

I have fixed the bug in Dic.Plurial() in both the Gamma and in GenoPro 2007.  The fix is available at http://www.genopro.com/download/InstallGenoPro.2.0.1.6.exe, and includes all the latest skin updates (Narrative, Descendants, and Gedcom).

Edited: Thursday, August 7, 2008 by GenoProSupport

Posted Saturday, August 9, 2008 - Post #22354
Forum Expert

Forum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum Expert

Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Thursday, March 6, 2025
Posts: 84, Visits: 288
Posted Sunday, August 10, 2008 - Post #22357
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:10 PM
Posts: 3,428, Visits: 26,569
I assume this translates to something like array index out of bounds. This is a very unusual error. It implies that you have a GenoMap with objects drawn on it that has no boundary rectangle.

Many releases ago this used to occur if the GenoMap had not been updated for some time,i.e. before the boundary rectangle property was introduced. Could this possibly be the case here? I thought this 'bug' in Genopro had been fixed and that whenever you saved a .gno file the boundary rectangle coordinates were saved.

Anyway,try updating the GenoMap in some way e.g. just add and delete a dummy object and then run the report again.


'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
Posted Sunday, August 10, 2008 - Post #22358
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:41 PM
Posts: 282, Visits: 12,608
About numbering in Descendants Report.
From early post:
"...technically correct in that the children are the FIRST generation of descendants..."
May be it is "technically correct", but "genealogically" is not correct for Descendants Report.
In genealogies the Descendants Report is usually used for FAMILY (not for an individual).
Traditionally the eldest individuals from the generation are the FIRST generation in these reports.
And the examples from the other product's Descendants reports confirm this.
Possibly it may be better to use two kinds of a report - for "family" and for" individual"?
Posted Sunday, August 10, 2008 - Post #22359
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Customers
Translator
GenoPro version: 2.0.1.6

Last Login: Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Posts: 390, Visits: 1,271
Ron,

I got this error when generating a Descendant Report with a Family selected:

Thanks,

JC

Edited: Monday, August 11, 2008 by GenoProSupport

Posted Monday, August 11, 2008 - Post #22364
Forum Expert

Forum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum ExpertForum Expert

Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Thursday, March 6, 2025
Posts: 84, Visits: 288
Ron!

Thanks for the reply. However... array index is still out of bounds...

Does the walkaround solution mean I have to add and delete an object to each and every map? Doing it just to one of them did not resolve the problem. I have quite a few GenoMaps... I tried exporting and importing, but that threw all my individuals onto one big unreadable map, so I will avoid that solution!

Anna

Posted Monday, August 11, 2008 - Post #22365
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:10 PM
Posts: 3,428, Visits: 26,569
Anna,
This is old issue, not just with the latest skin. I guess you have not generated a Narrative report from this file before. I have since discovered that you just need to open each GenoMap, i.e. visit it, a dummy update is not actually needed. If you then save the .gno GenoPro will save the BoundaryRect attributes as well and the problem will not reoccur. Alternatively you could attempt to discover which particluar genomaps do not have the attribute, and just visit them. One way is to inspect an XML export of the .gno file, and look at the <GenoMap> elements for missing BoundaryRect attributes. But it is probably easier just to visist each GenoMap and resave.

JC,
Yes just a silly typo, it should of course be oP0. I'll fix in the next update

And to Alex.

I think is a question of context, i.e. first generation of what? I think it depends or whether or not the implied qualifier is 'of the family' or 'of descendants'. As you will have seen fromm the earlier post, I started by calling the subject of report the 'First Generation', but then changed it.

This is case of 'you can please all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but never all of the people all of the time' Smile

I will add an option to choose either a family report, or a descendants report, with the former using a subheading for first individual/couple of 'First Generation' and adding ' of Descendants' to the subheadings of the latter.


'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
Posted Monday, August 11, 2008 - Post #22366
Famous Writer

Famous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous WriterFamous Writer

Customers
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Yesterday @ 2:41 PM
Posts: 282, Visits: 12,608
To Ron:
...This is case of 'you can please all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but never all of the people all of the time'... -
I agree... Smile
but I spoke about 'traditional' Genealogical numbering systems in Descendants reports:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogical_numbering_systems

…I started by calling the subject of report the 'First Generation', but then changed it…

Now we can find the different examples of Descendants reports, but I can not find similar report ..

Thank you.


Edited: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 by GenoProSupport
Posted Friday, August 15, 2008 - Post #22382
Forum Master

Forum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum MasterForum Master

Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Sunday, March 21, 2021
Posts: 716, Visits: 12,927
Have tried this latest release, but can not get the name of the Social Entity appear in the report. It remains blank.
Posted Sunday, August 17, 2008 - Post #22398
Legendary Master

Legendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary MasterLegendary Master

Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1

Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:10 PM
Posts: 3,428, Visits: 26,569
Yes, having looked into this, I can see I had some unfinished business, but I now have a correction. The handling of Social Entities was inconsistent and I had not completed the changes required to introduce the 'Title' Custom Tag.

I have a couple of unrelated items to amend and test before posting the amended version, hopefully this will be in two or three days.


'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"


Similar Topics

Click to view RSS...
Expand / Collapse

Reading This Topic

Expand / Collapse
Active: 2 - 1 guest, 0 members, 0 anonymous.
Refresh
No members currently viewing this topic!