|
|
|
|
Customers
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Posts: 27,
Visits: 303
|
Most family records contain identification of HUSB/WIFE/CHIL individuals together with DATE/PLAC of MARRiage, etc.
However, I have found an instance where the HUSB record is missing from the generated Gedcom file even though the individual concerned has a FAMS record identifying that family, ie in essence . . .
0 @ind00001@ INDI
1 NAME xxx1 /yyy1/
2 GIVN xxx1
2 SURN yyy1
1 SEX M
1 FAMS @fam00123@
0 @ind00002@ INDI
1 NAME xxx2 /yyy2/
2 GIVN xxx2
2 SURN yyy2
1 SEX F
1 FAMS @fam00123@
0 @fam00123@ FAM
1 WIFE @ind00002@
1 MARR
2 DATE dddd
2 PLAC pppp
Is there a known condition which can cause this omission? Might I have mis-specified something?
Other individuals/families are reported correctly.
I am using GenoPro Version 2.5.4.1 with report skin Gedcom_2014.05.05
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 9 hours ago
Posts: 3,337,
Visits: 25,587
|
I cannot explain this one and I do not recall this being reported before. I wonder if there are hyperlinks involved e.g. huband is hyperlinked to another map? Anything odd about the husband's ID value? Did you request renumbering of IDs in config param?
Worth trying the latest version of the Export to Gedcom skin ( 2014.09.26) but if that doesn't work could you send your .gno to me via an attachment to a PM on this forum or by File/Send within GenoPro itself and I'll take a closer look.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Posts: 27,
Visits: 303
|
I did wonder if the hyperlink associated with the husband might have had an effect but there are other instances, in the same genomap, where that does not cause any problem.
To keep each display simple, I have a separate tree for each surname with hyperlinks between them (and sometimes even within them where cousins have married). I have not requested any renumbering of IDs. I did not know that was possible.
I will send the .gno file, as suggested. There are only about 50 individuals involved (13 KB).
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 9 hours ago
Posts: 3,337,
Visits: 25,587
|
I have replied via PM. I guess we have the cause/solution.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Wednesday, December 7, 2016
Posts: 27,
Visits: 303
|
Thanks Genome but other forum watchers need not panic. It was my mistake and GenoPro is fine.
Inadvertantly, I had changed the sex of the husband to create a same sex marriage, long before it became legal.
|