|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:46 PM
Posts: 476,
Visits: 3,234
|
No suggestion needed.
What I meant is that the text is OK now.
|
|
|
Administrators Moderators Customers Gamma FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com Translator GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:52 PM
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,782
|
What text would you suggest?
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:46 PM
Posts: 476,
Visits: 3,234
|
Yes, the fix worked OK.
Also, the error message is much clearer now, mentioning the family first.
|
|
|
Administrators Moderators Customers Gamma FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com Translator GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:52 PM
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,782
|
I thought about this, however I decided to add the 'fix' icon to do it automatically. If an individual contains a lot of data, I think some users will appreciate a one-click solution. Does the 'fix' icon works on your family tree?
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:46 PM
Posts: 476,
Visits: 3,234
|
I found that the easiest way to fix this, without using the problem spotter, is as follows:- double click on the family link of the presumed parents
- you will notice and extra child in the list, not visible in the tree containing the parents (why did I not think about doing this in the first place?)
- delete this child, which will remove it from the related tree (in my case on another GenoMap)
- recreate the individual in the related tree
If you have to delete an individual with lots of data, best make a copy of the individual to another GenoGram first.
(I have GenoPro 2016 running on one system, 2011 on another. So I needed a way to fix this manually in 2011.)
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:46 PM
Posts: 476,
Visits: 3,234
|
In order to clarify the situation I further reduced the trees and renamed "Petrus Bernardus" into "Bernardus" to simplify. I also put the two trees together on the same map to show the correct relations. See below.

When I was trying to do this, I got following intermediate result

This now clearly shows the link. Hence, the problem spotter was right.
But I have no idea how this came to be in the first place.
|
|
|
Administrators Moderators Customers Gamma FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com Translator GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:52 PM
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,782
|
I fixed it in version 2.9.0.6. This was much harder than I thought, as I worked the whole day on it, as the problem was much deeper: an hyperlinked individual was displayed in one GenoMap while his family was in another GenoMap, thus making the pedigree link invisible. I have no idea how this came about, but one thing I know is the hyperlink of GenoPro has been a hack: creating two individuals where one refers to the other. Almost all the challenges I got with the Problem Spotter have been related to the hyperlink havoc because the Problem Spotter sees them as two individuals. (In GenoProX this is solved by having 'individual data' and 'individual view', thus there are no duplicate data).
I added a new column to fix this problem, because I think there is no way to fix it outside of the Problem Spotter. Once you click on the icon, GenoPro will create an hyperlink of the individual and place him at the bottom right of the family. You will have to manually move the individual so your family tree looks good. I tried several GUI options, but somehow there is a 'mouse capture' change which makes it very hard to do, so I decided to have a quick fix.
|
|
|
Administrators Moderators Customers Gamma FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com Translator GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:52 PM
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,782
|
Nand (20-Jul-2015) No, the problem is signalled for an individual that has no parents. So how can he be referred to as "child"?
And somehow the error is linked to the parents of a hyperlinked individual that is the son in law of the individual for which the problem is signalled (hope you can still follow).Can you please send me a sample file? It is possible an individual is a 'child' of a family (the horizontal line) however the family does not have an parents. In GenoPro, a family is the horizontal line and individuals are linked to the family as parents or children (biological, adopted, foster)
|
|
|
Customers Important Contributors GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Posts: 443,
Visits: 7,632
|
Yes, I understand - I was confused by the many Petrus.
However, I solved my problem. I deleted the (in my case hyperlinked) individual indicated, and immediately the Spotter changed to specify a duplicate pedigree link in the previously hyperlinked individual. As soon as the first (visible) one was deleted the error disappeared from the Spotter. It may be that the Spotter is confused by duplicate links - as these are superimposed on each other, they are not immediately obvious to the eye.
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:46 PM
Posts: 476,
Visits: 3,234
|
No, the problem is signalled for an individual that has no parents. So how can he be referred to as "child"?
And somehow the error is linked to the parents of a hyperlinked individual that is the son in law of the individual for which the problem is signalled (hope you can still follow).
|