|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 10 hours ago
Posts: 3,419,
Visits: 26,409
|
oops! so you didn't spot the (not so) deliberate mistake. <PhNoChildren T="[{?0}{?1}] />"
should of course be
<PhNoChildren T="[{?0}{?1}]" />
|
Note also the ? in front of 0. This stops had/have appearing. I've corrected the original post as well.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
Edited: Monday, October 10, 2005 by
Ron
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.0.1.5
Last Login: Saturday, March 14, 2020
Posts: 365,
Visits: 3,680
|
Woopie!  It works perfectly, thanks again.  I can now try the big tree, and keep my fingers crossed, having added the unknown missing spouses and removed the duplicate unused photos and removed the offending text.  I don't know if I might use this text one day, but I prefer to say nothing about unknown children for the moment as it seems to me to be obvious that if I knew of these children, I would include them. In other words, they either hadn't/haven't children or just haven't informed me yet! With the web tree without "living" it is especially useful not to mention further living generations. I have just noticed that the family pages have two types of name such as :- "family.F1465.htm" for the first lot and then :- "family.fam00071.htm" for the following majority. The indevidual pages are all as follows:- "ind14419.htm" In the old report all the family pages had names like:- "fam00071.htm" Any ideas why this is?
Edited: Monday, October 10, 2005 by
iaintait
|
|
|
|
|
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Customers
GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Sunday, January 21, 2018
Posts: 41,
Visits: 644
|
Howard53 (10/10/2005)
This has turned out to be a most useful check on the integrity of the marriage data. Yes - due to the error I found a wrong double marriage in my report. Questiton for Dan: there should be another TOOL (function) to test integrity of the data (marrage, pictures...). Do you plan to implement something for it?
Edited: Thursday, October 13, 2005 by
GenoProSupport
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Moderators
Customers
Gamma
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 2 hours ago
Posts: 4,886,
Visits: 22,776
|
imcon (10/10/2005)
Dan: there should be another TOOL (function) to test integrity of the data (marrage, pictures...). Do you plan to implement something for it?I agree. I will take a look at the issue this week.
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Monday, April 7, 2025
Posts: 210,
Visits: 1,950
|
imcon (10/10/2005)
.. there should be another TOOL (function) to test integrity of the data (marrage, pictures...). For example, on the Help directory exist the MorinTree.gno and on it the family fam00131 don't exist. (yes the family object, but no individuals  )
Edited: Thursday, October 13, 2005 by
GenoProSupport
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 10 hours ago
Posts: 3,419,
Visits: 26,409
|
I have made further updates to Dictionary.xml and Lang.vbs. See 1st post in this thread for download. This improves reporting of family relation field. e.g. if marriage dates present but relation = 'Divorce' then this is reflected in the narrative. Dictionary also updated to cater for case of only one grandparent being present.
(see http://support.genopro.com/Topic8880-60-1.aspx for more details)
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
Translator
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Sunday, March 21, 2021
Posts: 716,
Visits: 12,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
Important Contributors
GenoPro version: 3.0.0.7
Last Login: Sunday, November 26, 2023
Posts: 213,
Visits: 4,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrators
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: 10 hours ago
Posts: 3,419,
Visits: 26,409
|
I have provided an interim solution to the above by changing the narrative phrases for both education and occupation if the 'duration' field in GenoPro is set to 'current'. The revised files individual.htm & Dictionary.xml have been attached to the 1st post in this topic. These change 'attended' to 'attends' for education entries and 'was' to 'is' for occupation entries.
'lego audio video erro ergo disco' or "I read, I listen, I watch, I make mistakes, therefore I learn"
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
GenoPro version: 2.0.1.6
Last Login: Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Posts: 102,
Visits: 499
|
Ron, Could it be that the Dictionary.xml file is corrupted on your system?I tried downloading it, and the report runs, but once I try to edit it, I see japanese characters in it. Saving this causing the XML file to become so invalid that the report doesn't run anymore... Kind regards, Ronald
|