GenoPro Home
|
Get Started With My Genealogy Tree
|
Buy
|
Login
|
Privacy
|
Search
|
Site Map
GenoPro Support Forum
Home
Search
Tags
Who's On
Welcome Guest
(
Login
|
Register
)
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Home
»
GenoPro
»
Report Generator
»
Report Generator Bugs
»
Reporting with 2.17d
Reporting with 2.17d
Rate Topic
Topic View
Topic Options
Author
appleshaw
Posted Tuesday, August 1, 2006
-
Post #12204
Grand Master
Customers
Important Contributors
FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com
GenoPro version: 3.1.0.0
Last Login: 41 minutes ago
Posts: 1,595,
Visits: 32,483
Some general points
about
reporting and one that relates to my use of hyperlinked
families
. I cleared the cache and redownloaded, so hopefully I have the
latest version
. Is there a way to check this?
I have generated a
new version
at
http://familytrees.genopro.com/appleshaw/SussexSteers/
1 The most popular places are still showing the zero occurrences before the main list
2 When I open the person's details there can be two icons at the top right to expand/close the notes. Try James Steer (b. 1810) or those near to him.
3 James (1810) father Richard has the following comment (his wife has a similar one)
had an unspecified relationship with Richard.
I think that this is because there is a Social Relation link in the .gno file which can be seen on the .svg. However the .svg has not picked up that the other individuals are hyperlinks and in the .gno they are named. (This is being used to show that I think that the marriage in Petworth is of the family shown in Egdean - but not proven)
4 James Steer (b. 1810) appears with his wife Sarah in three different parishes as some children were born in each of them. All individuals are linked so that the information is the same on each GenoMap. On the present version it does not seem possible to hyperlink the marriages in the same way and so the report ends up showing three separate marriages of James & Sarah.
Any suggestions about how to clarify this?
Edited:
Tuesday, August 1, 2006 by
GenoProSupport
Threaded View
Threaded View
Reporting with 2.17d
By
appleshaw
(
Tuesday, August 1, 2006
)
Thanks for that - it is probably the reason for no familytrees.gno. By...
By
appleshaw
(
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
)
This problem gets more complicated as there is a mix of issues...
By
appleshaw
(
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
)
[quote][b]appleshaw (8/2/2006)[/b][hr]However there is no GenoPro...
By
Howard53
(
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
)
Thanks for these comments. 1 I can live with the blanks until...
By
appleshaw
(
Tuesday, August 1, 2006
)
Ok I will try to answer the points raised: 1) The fix for zero...
By
genome
(
Tuesday, August 1, 2006
)
I don't have all the answers, however I can answer this one: [quote]1...
By
GenoProSupport
(
Tuesday, August 1, 2006
)
Similar Topics
Reading This Topic
Powered By InstantForum.NET 2010-3-x © 2025
Execution: 0.016.
3 queries.
Compression Enabled.
Search All Forums...
GO
Advanced Search
Rate Topic
Great
Good
Average
Bad
Poor
Rate This Topic
Flat Ascending
Flat Descending
Threaded
Subscribe To Topic
Print This Topic
Goto Topics Forum