|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Saturday, March 29, 2025
Posts: 475,
Visits: 3,229
|
|
|
|
Gamma Customers Important Contributors FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com Translator GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Monday, March 24, 2025
Posts: 257,
Visits: 2,860
|
As I recall, long time ago there was a talk about XML tool for comparison and merge of files... I think it was of MS...
Lookup somewhere in third-party tools...
- "εν οιδα οτι ουδεν οιδα" (Σωκρατησ) - "The only thing that I know is that I don't know anything" (Socrates)
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Friday, October 18, 2013
Posts: 142,
Visits: 3,822
|
Perhaps you will be able to do something of this nature by taking advantage of the upcoming collaboration module. Dan?
Danny
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Saturday, July 11, 2020
Posts: 35,
Visits: 88
|
anyword?
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Saturday, July 11, 2020
Posts: 35,
Visits: 88
|
I found a temp solution
i've been using dropbox.com with the dropbox client. we just need to make sure not to edit at the same time.
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Saturday, March 29, 2025
Posts: 475,
Visits: 3,229
|
Merging files is not at all that easy. E.g., empty fields do not mean that the value is missing, it might have been deleted because it was wrong. Simply merging files would re-introduce the wrong value over and over again. You really need to timestamp each field in order to find out what the latest "correct" value is and this feature is probably not foreseen in GenoPro.Export two version of your GenoPro files to XML and use MS Word to merge and compare them. You will soon find out how difficult it is to define the correct logic of operation. I can only second appleshaw's comment. Make sure you carry the latest version of the GenoGram with you. Otherwise you are only looking for problems.
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 3.0.0.2
Last Login: Friday, October 2, 2015
Posts: 3,
Visits: 40
|
Doesn't look like it - and I would dearly love to be able to have some form of this feature. My thought is an expansion of the hyperlink concept. At the moment, if I get a tree from someone as a GEDCOM, and it branches off of a tree I already have, with (ideally) one point of overlap. I would like to be able to select that overlap person on the 2 genomaps, and "declare" it to be a hyperlink. that should kick up a panel if there is a problem with data merging e.g. conflicting dates, etc. that could then be dealt with. Any data not conflicting would simply merge, e.g. field empty in one record but not in the other. What I have to do at the moment is actually delete a person in one map, and recreate them with a hyperlink from the second. And I lose any relationships that this person had on the second map by doing this.
Edited: Friday, October 16, 2009 by
Elmar
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Saturday, July 11, 2020
Posts: 35,
Visits: 88
|
any word?
|
|
|
Customers GenoPro version: 2.5.4.1
Last Login: Saturday, July 11, 2020
Posts: 35,
Visits: 88
|
A little of both
For example I worked a little on my mothers side on my laptop and i added dates deaths updated names( spelling and middle names)
but i also added newborns stuff like that
|
|
|
Customers FamilyTrees.GenoPro.com GenoPro version: 3.1.0.1
Last Login: Saturday, March 29, 2025
Posts: 475,
Visits: 3,229
|
Holidays I guess ...Robert, when you say people are "adding info", is that just details like dates, places and comments or also complete new parts of your tree? Nand
|